Doujinshi Bleach Online

IF THE TROJAN HORSE OF THE PHILIPPINES

[The true secularism does not exclude religion, on the contrary, the Secularism is a fundamentalist ideology that attempts to remove from society the transcendent dimension of man.

A few non-English Socialists put these distinctions are nerves, but what can we do? . A friend of mine used to repeat often: "I like the clear stuff. It is easy to suppose, this friend is quite the terminological confusion Current crisis is slowing , euthanasia is dignified death, abortion is pro-choice , the transfer is simply timely contribution water, etc., etc.

A Marcello Pera, a secular thinker, Professor of Philosophy of Science and former president of the Italian Senate likes to think in a clear and precise. says: "State would distinguish between 'secular' and 'secular'. By 'secular' I understand that the state is separate from any church and acts autonomously. (...) The secularism, by contrast, is an ideology which aims to eliminate the religious dimension of man. "

Carlos Soler exposed otherwise, but also very clear, the very idea of \u200b\u200bMarcello Pera "The difference between secularity and secularism is that secularism take sides in religious issues. (...) secularism is, surprisingly, a kind of confessional."

Y better yet explain the true meaning of secularism: "... rule 'as if God did not exist 'is to take sides, is to govern' an atheist ', rule' as if God did not exist 'means denominational atheist, just to rule' as Catholic, or Muslim, or Anglican, was the real ' means confessional Catholic, Muslim, Anglican likewise govern 'as if we could not know whether God exists or not' is denominational agnostic. All these versions of the confessional are excluded by the secular, since they are ways of taking sides, what is precisely the secular rule requires acknowledging one's own incompetence to take sides in religious matters.

And Andrés Ollero, Professor of Philosophy of Law and director of the International Journal of Person and Law, develops demands of secularism:

Normal

"... secularism involves a triple ingredient

1. Public authorities not only to respect the beliefs of citizens but must enable them to be adequately illustrated by the denominations to which they belong.

2. Believers, made freely their personal conscience, have to renounce in public the whole argument of authority, reasoning in terms shared by any citizen and feeling them, before his church hierarchy, personally responsible for solving all problems arising from social interaction.

3. Agnostics and atheists also can not save this necessary argument but also have to provide it. This means giving up wielding a disqualifying non-authority argument, which will lead to an inquisitorial witch hunt on the ultimate grounds of the proposals of his countrymen. "

now published a juicy article of Juan Manuel de Prada in ABC entitled "The Trojan Horse of secularism".]

# 438 Several Category-Miscellaneous: Ethics and Anthropology

by Juan Manuel de Prada

________________________

has interpreted the secularist offensive announced by Vice President De la Vega as a kind of "hare"-in expression fortunate Ignacio Camacho, which was launched to divert attention from other more contentious issues or mandatory. But it would be naïve if we Negas to envision the purpose of social engineering behind the offensive. The society is composed of individuals, and individuals are, overwhelmingly religious in nature. The State as a structural building society, has the obligation to meet the religiosity of the individuals who compose it and to find solutions that allow religious sensitivities can coexist in peaceful coexistence. The English Constitution enshrines the principle of the Establishment Clause of the State, gave a solution to this problem: while no religion has an official, public authorities undertake to maintain cooperative relations with the various denominations, attending to the beliefs of society, of which it is clear that such cooperation has to be special with the Catholic Church, embody-historically, but hic et nunc, the majority faith of the English. The constitutional solution coincides with the ideal of modern pluralistic state, and equally than coercive forms of other times (where a majority sought to impose their religion on others) and also the liberal formula, which suggests that the State remains alien or indifferent to the religious beliefs of citizens.

The secularist ideal is an unholy combination of the liberal formula and coercive forms of other times. Proposes that religion is a private matter, but his intimate, shameful desire, is simply to eliminate religion as a reality, both public and private, beginning with the first. And know that secularism is a religion confined to the private sector itself is not religion: religion is bound to be social, since man is ("zoon politikon" Aristotle defined it) and therefore have to break into public life. Trying to repress the social manifestations of religious sentiment, which is the most complex of all intellectual affections, but also the most stubborn and violent, only brings pain to the social body. This happened, for example, when it occurred Azaña enact the sudden disappearance of religion in Spain.

No one is aware that the new offensive secular announced by the Government is only intended to remove the influence of Catholicism on the English society. And you know that man, removed religion, superstition begins to ooze. The Government understands, and understands well, that religion is the last defense to protect a man against the secular superstitions. Also understands that, confined to the private sector, the religious man and ends up withering slain. And understand, finally, that with its defunct religion, man becomes more fragile and malleable, more malleable to any exercise in social engineering. It is very figure out what the Vice President De la Vega, while announcing the offensive secular government, anticipating a resounding "Human Rights Plan." The religious man knows, as Benedict XVI said in his recent speech to the General Assembly of the United Nations that human rights are based on natural law inscribed in his heart, present in different cultures and civilizations, and which are therefore universal and prior to any form of political organization. The man who has been removed religion has no choice but to embrace secular superstition, that the meaning and interpretation of human rights can vary depending on the political context of each moment, in this way, human rights cease to be a universal and inalienable human property, subject to any form of political organization, to become a gracious concession of government of the day, you can configure them to their free will and to dispose.

I sincerely believe that the secular government offensive is much more than a hare, dear Ignacio: the Trojan horse of the Regime.